Imagine holding a 400-year-old anatomy lesson in your hands—literally. That's exactly what Guillermo del Toro's latest cinematic masterpiece, Frankenstein, brings to life. But here's where it gets controversial: this isn't just a reimagining of Mary Shelley's iconic 1818 novel; it's a meticulous homage to the macabre medical practices of the Victorian era, complete with jaw-dropping displays of human tissue that blur the line between art and science. And this is the part most people miss—these aren't just props; they're inspired by real, centuries-old anatomical displays known as the Evelyn Tables, which still exist today.
Del Toro's film, a far cry from the typical monster flick, stays true to the original story's roots, even opening with a ship trapped in ice and avoiding the oft-misquoted line, 'It's alive!' Instead, it dives deep into the scientific and historical context that inspired Shelley's tale. The attention to detail is staggering, from the gruesome methods of obtaining human specimens to the theatricality of public dissections—a practice that was as much about showmanship as it was about education.
One scene, in particular, stands out: Dr. Frankenstein examines a human lymphatic system, meticulously dissected and spread across a wooden board the size of a dinner table. This isn't just a Hollywood invention; it's a nod to the Evelyn Tables, created in the mid-1600s by a German anatomy professor's assistant and collected by John Evelyn. These tables, now housed at the Hunterian Museum in London, served as invaluable teaching tools, offering a stable and portable way to study human anatomy when cadavers were scarce.
But why go to such lengths? The film's creative team didn't just rely on imagination; they immersed themselves in Victorian-era medical research, visiting archives and museums to ensure historical accuracy. Bruce Simpson, a senior curator at the Hunterian Museum, explains that the Evelyn Tables were more than just diagrams—they were real human specimens, preserved and arranged to mimic their natural positions in the body. Each table highlights a different system: the spinal cord and central nervous system, the aorta and arteries, the vagus and sympathetic nerves, and the distribution of veins.
Fast forward to the 21st century, and del Toro's team faced a unique challenge: creating a fictional fifth Evelyn Table for the film. Production designer Tamara Deverell insisted on a hands-on approach, rejecting digital effects in favor of tangible, organic craftsmanship. 'It had to be hand-expressed,' she says, emphasizing the importance of authenticity. The result? A lymphatic system so lifelike it's eerily beautiful, complete with thin threads mimicking connective tissue and sculpted lymph nodes.
Here's the bold question: Should the intricacies of human anatomy remain the domain of medical professionals, or should this knowledge be accessible to everyone? Simpson argues the latter, believing that understanding one's own body shouldn't be guarded by an elite few. This raises a broader debate: How much should art and entertainment challenge our comfort zones in the name of education and historical accuracy?
Beyond its visual and historical brilliance, del Toro's Frankenstein revisits themes often overlooked in previous adaptations, such as parental abandonment and the loss of a child. And let's not forget Jacob Elordi's standout performance, which has critics and audiences alike singing his praises. Whether you're a science buff, a horror enthusiast, or just someone who appreciates a well-crafted film, this version of Frankenstein is a must-watch.
So, what do you think? Is del Toro's blend of historical accuracy and cinematic artistry a triumph, or does it cross a line? And does Jacob Elordi deserve all the hype? Let us know in the comments—we're eager to hear your take!
Ready to dive deeper into the science behind your favorite films and shows? Subscribe to Science Goes To The Movies and explore the fascinating intersection of science and pop culture every month. Subscribe here.
